The Blueprint for World War III

      1 Comment on The Blueprint for World War III


This article is the first of a two part series which details the coming war. This war will not be a simple war of occupation such as what we saw in Iran and presently in Afghanistan. This war will be utterly devastating and has the potential to escalate into a conflict befitting the over-used term, “Armageddon”.emp2_250x200-0e4ef61

Part one of this series will present what boxing fans call, “the tale of tape”. The “tale of the tape” entails identifying the combatants, their respective sides as well as the relative strengths of the participants and their military forces.

The Relative Strengths of Each Side

The coming war will largely feature what pundits call the BRIC nations and the USA and her allies. Each side of this coming conflict possesses widely divergent military strengths, weaknesses and strategies.

The US Is Dependent On a Devastating First Strike Attack

The United States and her allies have a decided advantage of quick strike, long range battlefield capabilities because of superior aircraft and carrier strike capabilities. The BRIC nations have an advantage with manpower, rocket propelled weapons and tanks. The USA and her allies cannot win a sustained battlefield campaign because of the attrition factor. The Chinese have demonstrated the ability to negate the United States Navy’s technological advantage through the use of killer satellites. Therefore, the entire US strategy is predicated on a first strike before the Chinese can destroy the majority of the eyes and ears of the US military, namely, its superior satellite capabilities in which the US forces can quickly locate and destroy the enemy with its smart weapons before the enemy knows what hit them.

Nuclear Submarines Are the “X Factor”


Nuclear submarines are often looked at as the great equalizer. No matter who is winning on the ground, in the air and on the surface of the oceans, the submarine force has the capability to reign down unimaginable destruction upon their enemy. In the case of submarines, the USA and her allies are matched by their BRIC counterparts. Most subs carry eight nuclear missiles, each capable of destroying a major nuke-sub-firingcity. The USA presumably has superior evasive techniques and therefore, would presumably survive sub-killer strategies with greater frequency that their BRIC adversaries. Therefore, the BRIC nations might win every land battle, however, the victorious BRIC nations would not have many of its cities left to return to in the case of a nuclear war. The US submarines are, in effect, a formidable doomsday weapon.

 The Trigger Event

nuke-silo-launchFor the United States and her allies to win a conventional war, a quick strike, surprise engagement is critical to the success of these forces. The BRICS would have an advantage in a longer prolonged conflict.This is particularly true when one considers that if time permitted, the Chinese have bragged that they could put 100 million men on a battlefield. Following the teachings of Sun Tsu in the famous book, The Art of War, it is critical that the


BRIC nations be brought to the battlefield of choice by the USA for a quick and decisive engagement.nuke-silo-command-structure

From a conventional warfare standpoint, the engagement is likely to be naval and involve aircraft. This plays to the advantage to the USA, whose superior long range strike capability is enhanced by their superior aircraft carriers.The USA forces would likely engage in a distracting land engagement first to hold and occupy the maximum number of the BRIC forces. The land strike, a first strike, will be directed at Syria. Given the present crisis, the Russians would have to decide on choosing between protecting its eastern border with the NATO forces poised to attack, or launching an offensive directed at protecting Syria. The Russians will choose self-defense. The timing of the American invasion of Syria will take place when a sufficient number of American naval vessels are present in the Black Sea to checkmate the Russia military build up in Crimea which would serve as a staging area for military action in Syria. At the end of the day, once a large contingent of the American navy has moved into position off of the Baltic states, Russia will be powerless to prevent an US takeover of Syria. The path and progress of the CIA force ,ISIS, as it creates more designed havoc in Syria, will provide the impetus for US forces to enter Syria, thus provoking a Russian and a BRIC nation unified response.

Conventional wisdom states that once the US occupies Syria, Russia will be powerless to intervene on behalf of America’s next target, Iran because the US medium range missile batteries will prevent the Russian army from moving south into the region. With Russia out of the way, Iran will capitulate and stop selling oil for gold to the BRIC nations and the Petrodollar will be preserved. Iran will agree to the control of their oil fields by the US to avoid an invasion. They will capitulate because nobody will come to their rescue. At least that is what the US is hoping for. In part two, I will present a more likely scenario.EMPtr04

What about India and China? Won’t they move to protect Iran and thus, erode the Petrodollar? Not exactly, as China and India will have their hands full. The naval strike that I speak of will be directed at China. Before the commencement of hostilities, China will be given a short time to stand down or face destruction by the US submarines and the long range capabilities of US carriers. It is only necessary to target China’s major cities to force capitulation. This strategy would free the disenchanted Chinese, living in the rebellious outlying provinces to launch a revolution against Beijing. It is also rumored that the US does have space based nuclear weapons. If this is the case, this conflict could be over in the early morning hours of the first day. The Chinese submarine force could be capable of taking out several US cities, however, their submarines alone will not change the outcome. India will be held in check by Pakistan. Subsequently, India will never enter the fight. US forces in Afghanistan could block a Russian invasion of Pakistan from the north. It is clear that the USA and her allies will decisively defeat the BRIC nations in a conventional war, so long as it is a short conflict.

However, there is one game-changing strategy that the BRICS could employ. If the BRIC nations were to simultaneously launch a series of high altitude ICBM’s over every theater of potential war, the high altitude nuclear blast could create an EMP attack on a global scale. Such an action would negate the technological advantage of the US military and reduce the conflict to brutal savagery which would be dominated by global famine. Certainly the super elite would experience their much-coveted population reduction on an unprecedented scale. This action would ultimately produce a military stalemate and the war would disintegrate into one brute force versus another for a very long time. The former popular TV show, Revolution, comes to mind. More on the trigger event along with a more detailed chronology will be presented in the next part of this series.

The Tale of the Tape: The BRICS vs. the USA and Her Allies



BRIC Nations Conventional Military Strength

Most Likely to Fight

                          Men             Planes                Tanks               Carriers                        Subs               Rockets

Russia           766,000          3,082                 1,550                 1                                    62                    3,781

China             2,825,000       2,788                 9,150                 1                                    69                    1,770

India              1,325,000        1,785                 3,569                 2                                    17                      292

Total 4,916, 000 7,655 14,269 4 148 5,843

(NOTE: The forces of North Korea would be absorbed by China

Ukraine and Belarus have a combined military strength of 200,000 men)


USA Allied Nations Conventional Military Strength

                                 Men                Planes                 Tanks             Carriers              Subs              Rockets

USA                1,430,000               13,685                8,325             10                           72                  1,330

UK                    205,330                     900                   400                1                           11                       60

FR                    230,000                 1,200                    420                1                           10                       60

GRM              180,000                      710                    410                 0                            4                      250

TURK            410,500                       990                 3,660                0                          14                      650

S KOR            640,000                  1,400                  2,350                0                          14                      250

JAP               250,000                    1,600                      770                1                          16                      100

TOT 3,345,830 20,475 8,325 13 141 2,700

Source: Global Fire Power


DIAThe nuclear arsenals of the BRICS vs. the USA and her allies are equivalent on paper. However, the reliability factor, related to the weapons, clearly favors the USA. To the sane person, the topic of nuclear war is almost a moot point. If either side resorts to the use of nuclear weapons on anything more than a battlefield scale with tactical nuclear weapons, this would render the conflict meaningless as the planet would be a very undesirable place to inhabit. Then again, the psychopathic elite, safely tucked

away in the tunnels beneath Denver International Airport, may feel they have the ability to wait out the devastation going on above. The following data demonstrates the ultimate futility of employing dia-mural-4-nwo-airport-commissionnuclear weapons on a regional and intercontinental basis. Of course, recognizing the futility of such utter destruction and hoping that this would serve as a deterrent to the psychopathic bankers from starting such a conflict, cannot be counted on. After all, if one’s ultimate goal is the destruction and reduction of 90% of the human race, and a nuclear war would constitute the level of chaos needed in order to bring forth “the order of out chaos” which would be needed to usher in the New World Order. This makes nuclear war more, not less likely!

This display, located at DIA, speaks volumes to the awake among us.


Country       Warheads active/total       Date of first test        AFFILIATION       
United States        2,150 / 7,70016                                  July 1945 (“Trinity“)                          NATO

Russia                    1,800 / 8,5002                                  9 August 1949 (“RDS-1“)                     NATO

United Kingdom   160 / 225                                            3 October 1952                                    NATO

France                    290 / 300                                        13 February 1960                                   NATO
(“Gerboise Bleue“)
China                    n.a. / 250                                           16 October 1964 (“596“)                        BRIC

India                       n.a. / 90–110                                   18 May 1974                                             BRIC
(“Smiling Buddha“)
Pakistan             n.a. / 100–120                                     28 May 1998                        UNDETERMINED
North Korea        n.a. / <10                                  9 October 2006           BRIC Undeclared nuclear powers

Israel                   n.a. / 60-200

Unknown (possibly 22 September 1979) INDEPENDENT
U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe

Country                              Air base                                        Custodian                            Warheads
Belgium                          Kleine Brogel                                 52nd Fighter                          Wing 10~20

Germany                        Büchel                                            52nd Fighter                          Wing 10~20

Italy                                Ghedi Torre                                    6th Fighter                            Wing 40

                                        Aviano                                            31st Fighter                            Wing 50

Netherlands                  Volkel                                              52nd Fighter                          Wing 10~20

Turkey                           Incirlik                                            39th Air Base                         Wing 60~70
                                                                                                    Total                                      150~200

Source:  Hans M. Kristensen (26 June 2008). Status of U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe”.Federation of American Scientist

Other useful resources:BP_003-240x200

Backyard Innovator (A Self Sustaining Source Of Fresh Meat,Vegetables And Clean

Blackout USA (EMP survival and preparedness)

Conquering the coming collapse (Financial advice and preparedness )

Liberty Generator (Build and make your own energy source)

Backyard Liberty (Easy and cheap DIY Aquaponic system to grow your organic and living food bank)

Bullet Proof Home (A Prepper’s Guide in Safeguarding a Home )

Family Self Defense (Best Self Defense Strategies For You And Your Family)

Sold Out After Crisis (Best 37 Items To Hoard For A Long Term Crisis)

About the Author

Dave Hodges is the host of the popular radio talk show, which airs from 9 PM to Midnight (Central). The show can be heard by clicking the following icon in the upper right hand corner of The Common Sense Show.




1 thought on “The Blueprint for World War III

  1. Pingback: Obama bringing world to brink of World War III will mark the end all of humanity

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.